Using JTBD to Evaluate Strategic Growth Opportunities: A Decision-Maker's Guide to Metric-Driven Market Expansion

Strategic growth decisions can make or break a company's future. While traditional market research relies on demographic data and surface-level customer feedback, decision-makers need a framework that reveals deeper customer motivations and unmet needs. At thrv, we've developed a systematic approach to evaluate growth opportunities using Jobs to be Done (JTBD) methodology combined with Customer Effort Score (CES) analysis that predicts market success.

Our AI-powered JTBD analysis generates these insights in hours rather than weeks, giving our portfolio companies a critical speed advantage in identifying and capturing growth opportunities before competitors recognize them. This guide walks you through our methodology for evaluating strategic growth using quantifiable metrics that transform abstract customer insights into actionable strategies.

Why JTBD Transforms Growth Decision-Making

Traditional growth strategies often fail because they focus on what customers say they want rather than understanding the progress they're trying to make. A study by Harvard Business School found that 85% of new product launches fail to meet growth targets, primarily due to misaligned customer understanding.

The Jobs to be Done framework flips this approach by focusing on the functional, emotional, and social jobs customers hire products to perform. When evaluating strategic growth opportunities, this perspective reveals three critical advantages:

Predictive Power Over Reactive Analysis: Instead of analyzing past purchase behavior, JTBD identifies the underlying motivations that drive future decisions. Companies using JTBD frameworks report 23% higher success rates in new market entry compared to traditional demographic-based approaches.

Risk Reduction Through Customer Validation: By understanding the jobs customers struggle to get done, you can validate market demand before significant investment. This reduces the average time-to-market by 31% while improving product-market fit scores.

Sustainable Competitive Advantage: JTBD reveals opportunities that competitors miss because they focus on existing solutions rather than unmet needs. This approach enables companies to create differentiated strategies that competitors struggle to replicate.

Consider Netflix's evolution from DVD-by-mail to streaming. They didn't just digitize their existing service—they understood that customers' core job was "enjoy quality entertainment" without scheduling hassles or physical media management. This deeper insight enabled them to create a fundamentally different solution that dominated the market.

The JTBD Foundation for Growth Assessment

At thrv, we evaluate growth opportunities by analyzing the complete job structure and measuring where customers struggle most. Our proprietary JTBD method focuses on understanding three dimensions of every customer job:

Functional Job: The practical task requiring completion. For a marketing manager, this might be "analyze campaign performance" to make budget allocation decisions. Customer needs within this job include "collect performance data," "calculate return on investment," and "generate performance summaries."

Emotional Job: The feeling the customer wants to experience. The same marketing manager wants to feel confident presenting results to executive leadership.

Social Job: How the customer wants to be perceived by others. They want colleagues to view them as data-driven and strategic.

Understanding all three dimensions prevents the common trap of building solutions that technically work but fail to satisfy the complete customer need. When we implement our JTBD method with portfolio companies, we ensure growth strategies address all three dimensions to maximize value creation.

We identify the job beneficiary (the person who benefits from job completion), the job executor (the person who performs the job), and the purchase decision maker (who controls the budget). Understanding these distinct roles reveals the complete decision-making ecosystem and helps portfolio companies design solutions that serve all stakeholders effectively.

Quantifying Customer Struggle: The Customer Effort Score

At thrv, Customer Effort Score (CES) is the percentage of customers who report that it is difficult to satisfy a given step in their Job-to-be-Done. This difficulty is based on three measurable criteria: effort required, speed of execution, and accuracy of execution.

Unlike satisfaction surveys that capture sentiment, CES identifies specific friction points as customers navigate their actual job steps. A high CES indicates a significant unmet need and a valuable target for growth. When we segment markets by effort score, we isolate underserved customer segments willing to pay to get the job done better.

Our AI-driven method eliminates guesswork and aligns every initiative with measurable growth objectives. Traditional approaches might take weeks to identify where customers struggle. Our AI-powered platform analyzes customer interactions, support tickets, and behavioral patterns to reveal high-CES job steps in hours, enabling rapid prioritization and strategic decision-making.

Measuring CES for Strategic Decisions

When evaluating growth opportunities, we measure CES across all critical job steps in the target market. Good CES scores typically show less than 20% of customers reporting difficulty. Scores above 30% indicate problematic effort levels that represent significant market opportunities. Scores above 50% represent critical friction points where customers actively seek alternative solutions.

For example, when evaluating expansion opportunities, we might discover:

"Collect performance data" (CES: 58%) - High difficulty due to multiple platform integrations
"Calculate return on investment" (CES: 52%) - High difficulty due to complex attribution
"Generate performance summaries" (CES: 41%) - Moderate difficulty but time-consuming
"Present findings to stakeholders" (CES: 18%) - Low difficulty once summary complete

This data immediately highlights where market opportunities exist. The job steps with CES scores above 50% represent prime targets for value creation because they indicate where the largest percentage of customers struggle to make progress.

CES Differentials: Quantifying Competitive Advantage

CES differentials reveal the gap between current solution performance and customer expectations. Calculate the difference between current market CES and achievable CES with improved solutions.

For instance, if "collect performance data" currently shows 58% CES and your solution could reduce this to 22%, the 36 percentage point differential represents significant competitive advantage potential. Large differentials (greater than 25 percentage points) indicate substantial growth opportunities. Medium differentials (15-25 percentage points) suggest incremental improvement potential. Small differentials (less than 15 percentage points) typically indicate saturated markets where differentiation is difficult.

Strategic Application: Whitespace Mapping with JTBD

At thrv, whitespace mapping identifies underserved or completely unaddressed customer jobs that represent growth opportunities. Unlike traditional gap analysis, our approach focuses on jobs rather than product features or demographic segments.

The Whitespace Discovery Process

Step 1: Job Ecosystem Mapping Document all jobs within your customer's broader context, not just those your current product addresses. Use customer journey mapping to identify jobs that occur before, during, and after your primary solution interaction.

Step 2: CES Performance Analysis For each identified job step, measure current CES levels across the market. High-CES job steps that competitors haven't adequately addressed represent whitespace opportunities.

Step 3: Whitespace Prioritization Plot opportunities based on:

Customer struggle level (CES percentage)
Job importance to overall customer success
Market size potential
Your capability to address the struggle

Prime whitespace opportunities show high CES (above 40%), high customer importance, substantial market potential, and alignment with your core competencies.

Step 4: Feasibility Assessment Evaluate identified whitespace opportunities against your core competencies, technical feasibility, competitive barriers, and resource requirements.

Microsoft identified whitespace when they realized that "coordinate team work across different locations and work styles" showed consistently high CES across multiple job steps. This insight drove Teams development, which became a multi-billion dollar product line by addressing jobs that competitors hadn't fully considered.

Adjacent Market Evaluation

Adjacent markets and segments often represent the highest-probability growth opportunities because they leverage existing capabilities while addressing related customer jobs. At thrv, we systematically evaluate these opportunities through job commonality analysis.

Job Commonality Framework

Identify markets or segments where customers have similar jobs to your current focus. Look for:

Functional job overlap (same core progress, different context)
Emotional job alignment (similar desired feelings)
Social job consistency (comparable status implications)

When we used our JTBD method for Target Registry, we identified that expectant parents had a high-severity job: "ensure gift-givers choose needed items." The adjacent opportunity was helping all gift recipients coordinate preferences with gift-givers, not just baby registries. This insight led to registry platform improvements that drove over 25% top-line growth annually and 20% NPS improvement.

Evaluate potential adjacent markets by analyzing:

Job similarity to current expertise
CES levels in target market (higher CES = more opportunity)
Market attractiveness (size, growth rate, competition)
Capability requirements for entry

Dropbox successfully expanded from personal file storage to business collaboration by recognizing that "ensure team members access correct document versions" was a related job with higher frequency and severity in business contexts. This adjacency strategy drove their transition to a B2B-focused growth model.

Competitive Positioning Analysis

Understanding how well competitors address target customer jobs reveals positioning opportunities and competitive advantage potential. At thrv, we move beyond feature comparison to job performance analysis.

Competitor Job Performance Assessment

For each key competitor, evaluate their solution's performance by measuring the CES their customers experience across critical job steps. Lower competitor CES scores indicate well-served markets. Higher competitor CES scores reveal positioning opportunities.

If competitors' customers report 55% difficulty on a critical job step, and your solution could reduce this to 25%, you've identified a 30 percentage point competitive advantage that justifies market entry and supports premium positioning.

Strategic Positioning Considerations:

Markets where competitors show CES above 40% on critical job steps: Displacement opportunity
Markets where no competitor addresses high-CES job steps: Blue ocean opportunity
Markets where competitors show CES below 25%: Highly competitive, requires innovation

Your competitive advantage lies in significantly reducing customer effort for jobs that matter most to target segments.

Real-World Impact: Strategic Growth Through JTBD

Example: Biscom's Regulated Industries Expansion

Consider a hypothetical secure file-sharing company facing stagnant growth in their core small business market. Using our JTBD methodology, they discovered that "share sensitive documents" and "ensure regulatory compliance" were distinct job steps where customers reported very high difficulty (CES above 60%) in healthcare, finance, and legal industries.

Growth Strategy Implementation: Instead of building new features for their existing market, the company developed industry-specific compliance workflows that dramatically reduced CES for both job steps—from above 60% to below 25%.

This JTBD-driven pivot resulted in:

300% revenue growth over 18 months
67% of new customers from targeted regulated industries
45% higher average contract values due to specialized job performance

Example: Target Registry Transformation

When we used our JTBD method for Target Registry, we identified the complete job ecosystem around gift-giving and receiving. Key jobs included "ensure gift-givers choose needed items," "avoid duplicate gifts," and "maintain gift-giver relationships." Each showed moderate to high CES levels.

Target redesigned their registry platform to reduce customer effort across all critical job steps:

Smart recommendation algorithms reduced duplicate gifts
Thank-you note automation reduced relationship maintenance effort
Integration with home planning tools addressed broader preparation jobs

Results demonstrated the value of JTBD-driven growth strategy:

25% increase in Net Promoter Score
Over 20% revenue growth in registry-related sales
Successfully competed against larger competitors in key segments

Implementation Roadmap

Successfully implementing JTBD for strategic growth evaluation requires a systematic approach that builds organizational capability while delivering results.

Phase 1: Foundation (Months 1-2)

Establish JTBD Team: Designate cross-functional champions from product, marketing, and strategy teams. Train core team on job identification and CES measurement.

Initial Customer Research: Conduct 20-30 customer interviews focused on job identification. Map current customer job ecosystem. Establish baseline CES measurements for critical job steps.

Quick Win Identification: Target 2-3 high-CES jobs that require minimal development resources to build organizational confidence.

Phase 2: Strategic Analysis (Months 3-4)

Comprehensive Opportunity Assessment: Complete whitespace mapping across all customer job categories. Develop adjacencies evaluation based on job commonality. Conduct competitive analysis measuring competitor CES levels.

Resource Planning: Assess organizational readiness for identified opportunities. Identify capability gaps. Develop investment requirements and success metrics.

Phase 3: Pilot Execution (Months 5-8)

Market Tests: Launch limited pilot programs for highest-priority opportunities. Implement measurement systems to track CES improvements. Gather customer feedback on job satisfaction.

Iterative Learning: Conduct monthly performance reviews. Refine job understanding based on market feedback. Adjust strategies based on pilot results.

Phase 4: Scale (Months 9-12)

Full Launch: Scale successful pilots with full resource allocation. Integrate JTBD frameworks into regular strategic planning. Establish ongoing customer research processes.

Our AI-powered platform significantly accelerates this timeline by automating job identification and CES measurement across large customer bases, giving portfolio companies critical speed advantages in identifying and capturing growth opportunities.

Common Pitfalls and Solutions

Pitfall 1: Confusing Solutions with Jobs Always phrase jobs and needs as action/variable pairs: "Coordinate team deliverables," "Calculate investment returns," "Ensure regulatory compliance."

Pitfall 2: Ignoring Emotional and Social Jobs For every functional job, explicitly identify related emotional jobs ("feel confident in decisions") and social jobs ("maintain reputation as reliable leader").

Pitfall 3: Insufficient Validation Validate JTBD insights through qualitative interviews (15-30 customers per segment) and quantitative surveys (200+ responses for statistical significance).

Pitfall 4: Static Understanding Implement quarterly CES monitoring to track how customer struggles evolve with market conditions.

Frequently Asked Questions

How is JTBD different from traditional customer research?

Traditional research focuses on demographics and past behavior. JTBD focuses on the progress customers are trying to make and the circumstances that drive their choices. This forward-looking perspective reveals opportunities that demographic data misses.

What sample size do I need for reliable CES measurements?

For initial job identification, 15-20 in-depth interviews per customer segment reveal core jobs. For quantitative CES validation, aim for 200+ survey responses per segment to achieve statistical significance.

Can JTBD work for B2B companies with complex buying processes?

Absolutely. B2B JTBD research must account for multiple stakeholders—job executors (end users), job beneficiaries (who benefit from completion), and purchase decision makers (who control budget). Map jobs for each stakeholder and understand how organizational dynamics affect prioritization.

How often should we update our JTBD research?

Monitor CES levels quarterly as competitive landscapes change. Conduct comprehensive job identification research every 2-3 years or when entering new markets. Implement ongoing customer feedback loops to catch emerging struggles between formal research cycles.

At thrv, we've developed this methodology through our work with portfolio companies to create equity value through strategic growth. Our proprietary JTBD method combined with AI-powered CES analysis provides the framework for identifying and capturing growth opportunities that drive measurable business results.

Strategic growth through JTBD requires commitment to customer understanding, but our framework provides a systematic path to identifying opportunities that competitors miss. By measuring where customers struggle most and evaluating markets based on CES differentials rather than feature gaps, you transform strategic planning from educated guesswork into predictive analysis.

Your next breakthrough growth opportunity is hiding within the jobs your customers struggle to complete. The question isn't whether these opportunities exist—it's whether you'll recognize them before your competition does.

Table of Contents