Skip to content

Building Your Moat: How Customer Jobs Create Unbeatable Defensibility

Share:
Building Your Moa


You're watching your churn reports like a hawk. You've launched loyalty programs, offered discounts, and your customer success team is running on caffeine and save-the-account playbooks. Yet, you still feel vulnerable. A new competitor, a sudden market shift, or a pricing war feels like a constant, looming threat.


Here's the uncomfortable truth: Most retention strategies are just expensive forms of begging. They treat the symptom—customer loss—without addressing the root cause. They are temporary fixes, not permanent defenses.


What if you could build a business so deeply embedded in your customer's success that leaving you would be more painful than staying? Not because of contractual traps or data silos, but because you execute their most critical Job to be Done so effortlessly that no alternative is a viable option.


This isn't about loyalty. It's about lock-in. This is how you build a strategic moat.


At thrv, we've spent over a decade refining this approach with our portfolio companies. Our proprietary Jobs to be Done methodology doesn't just help companies retain customers—it engineers systematic competitive advantages that compound over time. This article provides the playbook we use to move companies beyond flimsy retention tactics to building unassailable market positions. We will explore how to identify your customer's core job, measure your performance in executing it, and use that insight to build a moat that insulates you from competition and creates lasting equity value.


Table of Contents


  • The Real Foundation of Defensibility: Your Customer's Job
  • Beyond Features: What is a Job to be Done?
  • The B2B Executive's Secret: Emotional and Social Jobs
  • The Moat Mechanism: How to Engineer Strategic Lock-In
  • Step 1: Find the Friction with Customer Effort Score
  • Step 2: From Low Effort to Procedural Lock-In
  • Real-World Example: Target Registry's Moat
  • The Financial Proof: Linking Low Effort to High Equity Value
  • Your Strategic Playbook: Building the Moat
  • Frequently Asked Questions


The Real Foundation of Defensibility: Your Customer's Job

The biggest mistake companies make is defining their market by their product category. You aren't in the "CRM software" market or the "logistics" market. Those are temporary solutions. Your real market is the stable, unchanging goal your customer is trying to achieve.


That goal is their Job to be Done.


Beyond Features: What is a Job to be Done?

A Job to be Done (JTBD) is the progress a person is trying to make in a given circumstance. It's what they need to accomplish, independent of any product or service. A homeowner doesn't want a quarter-inch drill bit; they want a quarter-inch hole to hang a picture and feel proud of their home. The job is "create a personalized living space," not "buy a drill."


Products are hired and fired, but the underlying job remains. By focusing on the job, you anchor your strategy to a stable target that doesn't change with technology fads or competitor feature launches. This is the bedrock of a defensible market position.


The B2B Executive's Secret: Emotional and Social Jobs

In B2B, this gets even more profound. You aren't just selling to a company; you're selling to a human being who has their own jobs to get done. These jobs have functional, emotional, and social components.


Example Customer Jobs for "Generate Board Report":


  • Functional Job: "Generate a compliant financial report for the quarterly board meeting"
    • Determine data accuracy thresholds
    • Identify relevant KPI trends
    • Calculate variance explanations
    • Ensure regulatory compliance requirements
  • Emotional Job: "Feel confident and secure presenting this data to the board"
  • Social Job: "Be seen as a competent, forward-thinking leader by my peers"


Most companies compete on the functional job. They add features to the reporting tool. But the winning companies—the ones with deep moats—solve the emotional and social jobs, too. They build a tool that not only generates the report but does so in a way that is so reliable, insightful, and easy to defend that the executive feels confident and looks competent.


When you solve for these deeper, often unspoken, needs, you stop being a vendor and become an indispensable partner in your customer's personal and professional success. That's a relationship competitors can't touch with a new feature list.


The Moat Mechanism: How to Engineer Strategic Lock-In

Understanding the customer's job is the foundation. But a true moat is built by executing that job so well that the idea of switching becomes unthinkable. This isn't about trapping customers; it's about creating so much value that they choose to stay, again and again.


At thrv, we've refined this approach through our work with portfolio companies across multiple industries. Our proprietary JTBD method systematically maps every step of the customer's job and uses AI-powered analysis to identify precisely where effort is highest and opportunity for differentiation is greatest. Our AI helps us generate these insights in hours—not weeks—giving our portfolio companies a critical speed advantage in identifying and addressing unmet needs before competitors even recognize the opportunity exists.


The mechanism for building this moat has two parts: measuring where your customers struggle and then systematically eliminating that struggle to create procedural lock-in.


Step 1: Find the Friction with Customer Effort Score

To build a moat, you need to find the cracks in your competitors' walls. These cracks aren't missing features; they are moments of high effort in the customer's journey to get their job done.


Instead of asking customers if they are "satisfied" or if a feature is "important"—vague metrics that lead to bloated, unfocused roadmaps—we must ask a much sharper question: How difficult was it to get the job done?


This is measured with the Customer Effort Score (CES). CES is the percentage of customers who report difficulty completing a specific step of their job. It focuses on tangible, measurable criteria: the speed, accuracy, and effort required.


The data is stark. Research from Gartner shows that 96% of customers who have a high-effort experience report being disloyal, compared to just 9% for low-effort experiences. High effort is the kryptonite of retention. It's a direct signal of an unmet need and a glaring vulnerability in your market position.


Our approach at thrv involves mapping every discrete step a customer takes to execute their job. We then use our AI-powered platform to measure the CES for each one, analyzing patterns across thousands of customers and hundreds of job steps. This creates a heat map of customer struggle, showing us exactly where to innovate to create the most value and, therefore, the strongest defensibility. What traditionally takes companies weeks or months of manual research, our AI-driven method accomplishes in hours, translating customer needs into actionable roadmaps with unprecedented speed and accuracy.


Step 2: From Low Effort to Procedural Lock-In

Once you identify high-effort job steps, the goal is simple: engineer solutions that make them effortless. When you do this better than anyone else, you create powerful, positive switching costs.


Think about it this way. In B2B, the deepest moats are built on procedural and technological lock-in. Companies like Salesforce or Oracle didn't win by having every conceivable feature from day one. They won by becoming the operational backbone for a critical job—like "manage customer relationships" or "run enterprise financials."


They identified high-effort steps in those jobs—like tracking sales activity or closing the books—and made them dramatically easier. Over time, entire teams trained on their workflows. Custom integrations were built. The software became deeply embedded in the company's daily operations.


Switching would mean more than just migrating data. It would mean retraining hundreds of employees, rebuilding years of custom workflows, and disrupting the entire business. The cost of switching isn't a line item; it's a massive operational risk.


This is the moat. It's not a feature; it's the sum of a thousand effortless interactions that have become the standard operating procedure. Your product becomes the path of least resistance not just for the user, but for their entire organization. You've stopped selling a tool and started providing a utility.


Real-World Example: Target Registry's Moat

When we used our JTBD method for Target Registry, we applied exactly this framework to reverse declining revenue trends and build sustainable competitive advantage.


The Challenge

Target Registry was facing declining revenue in a highly competitive market. Traditional approaches focused on adding more product features or matching competitor capabilities. But these tactics weren't addressing the fundamental problem: the gift registry creation and management process involved numerous high-effort steps that frustrated both gift givers and registry creators.


Our AI-Powered Analysis

Using our AI-powered platform, we mapped the complete job of "create and manage a gift registry for a major life event." We identified over 50 discrete steps in this job and measured Customer Effort Scores for each one. Our AI analysis revealed critical friction points that weren't visible through traditional user research:


  • Registry creators struggled to determine appropriate gift quantities across categories
  • Gift givers experienced high effort identifying gifts that matched their budget and the couple's preferences
  • Both groups faced accuracy issues ensuring gifts weren't duplicated or overlooked


These weren't just usability problems. They represented fundamental unmet customer needs in the core job execution.


Systematic Friction Elimination

We didn't add more features. Instead, we focused obsessively on eliminating effort at the highest-friction job steps. Our solutions became deeply embedded in how customers accomplished their goal:


  • Smart recommendation engines that reduced decision effort for registry creators
  • Intuitive filtering and sorting that made gift selection effortless for givers
  • Real-time synchronization that eliminated duplicate purchase anxiety
  • Seamless integration with Target's fulfillment systems that ensured accuracy


The Results: A Compounding Moat

The impact went far beyond traditional retention metrics. By making the job dramatically easier than any alternative, we built a true strategic moat:


  • Reversed declining revenue trends, achieving over 25% top-line growth annually within 12-18 months
  • Improved Net Promoter Scores by 20%, reflecting genuine customer enthusiasm rather than mere satisfaction
  • Created procedural lock-in where customers who used Target Registry once became repeat users for subsequent life events
  • Generated competitive advantage that forced other retailers to study and attempt to replicate Target's approach—validating that we had transformed a market follower into a market leader


The moat wasn't built on contractual terms or data silos. It was built on flawless execution of the customer's job. Switching to a competitor would mean returning to high-effort experiences customers had already escaped. That's a defensible position.


The Financial Proof: Linking Low Effort to High Equity Value

Building a moat on job execution isn't just a product strategy; it's a financial one. Systematically reducing customer effort has a direct and measurable impact on the two most important metrics for long-term growth: Customer Lifetime Value (CLV) and Net Revenue Retention (NRR).


Recalibrating CLV: The True Value of an Effortless Experience

Traditional Customer Lifetime Value calculations often use a single, blended churn rate, masking critical insights. A far more powerful approach is to segment your CLV calculation by Customer Effort Score cohorts.


When you do this, the picture becomes incredibly clear:


  • High-Effort Cohort: These customers have a higher churn rate, a shorter lifespan, and a lower CLV. They are expensive to support and are actively looking for alternatives.
  • Low-Effort Cohort: These customers stay longer, have a much higher CLV, and are less price-sensitive. They are your most valuable asset.


CES acts as a leading indicator for CLV. By focusing your product and go-to-market strategy on moving customers from high-effort to low-effort, you are directly and predictably increasing the total equity value of your customer base. You can finally draw a straight line from a product improvement to a quantifiable increase in company valuation.


Our work across portfolio companies consistently demonstrates this connection. When we helped Target Registry reduce effort in critical job steps, we didn't just improve satisfaction scores—we generated a 40% increase in customer lifetime value by extending how long customers stayed engaged with the platform and how much they spent over time.


Powering NRR: How Job Execution Drives Expansion

Net Revenue Retention is arguably the single most important metric for a healthy, growing company. An NRR over 100% means you can grow even without adding new customers. And the engine of NRR isn't a clever upsell script; it's flawless execution of the core job.


Think about it from the customer's perspective. If you are struggling to get their primary job done, why would they ever trust you to handle an adjacent one? High effort on the core product kills any opportunity for expansion.


But when you make the core job effortless, trust is established. You've proven your competence. This makes the conversation about an upsell or cross-sell feel natural and helpful:


  • "You've helped us streamline our lead management so effectively. Can you do the same for our customer support ticketing?"
  • "The basic reporting is so fast and accurate. We're ready to invest in the advanced analytics module."


Solving the core job with low effort is the ultimate land-and-expand strategy. It builds the foundation of trust required for customers to hire you for more and more jobs, driving NRR and creating a powerful, compounding growth engine.


Your Strategic Playbook: Building the Moat


Moving from tactical retention to strategic defensibility requires a shift in focus from your product to your customer's job. Here's the playbook we use at thrv to accelerate this process for our portfolio companies:


1. Map the Full Job

Go beyond the functional. Work to uncover the emotional and social jobs your customer is trying to get done. What makes them feel successful? What helps them look good to their boss? This is where true differentiation lies.


Our AI-powered analysis helps accelerate this discovery process by analyzing customer behavior patterns, support interactions, and usage data to surface the complete job structure—including the unspoken emotional and social dimensions that customers rarely articulate but always value.


2. Measure the Effort

Implement a system to measure Customer Effort Score at each critical step of the job. Don't rely on vague satisfaction surveys. Pinpoint the exact moments of struggle, as these are your greatest opportunities for innovation.


Focus your measurement on these questions for each job step:


  • How much effort did this require?
  • How quickly could you complete this?
  • How accurate was the outcome?


Our platform systematically collects and analyzes this data across customer segments, using AI to identify patterns that would take months to uncover manually. This quantitative foundation eliminates guesswork and aligns every product initiative with measurable growth objectives.


3. Engineer the Moat

Focus your research and development resources on eliminating the biggest points of friction identified by your CES data. Build solutions that become deeply embedded in your customer's workflow, creating positive switching costs based on superior value, not contractual obligation.


The goal isn't to add features. It's to make the job steps that currently require high effort become nearly automatic. When you accomplish this, you're not just improving your product—you're becoming infrastructure.


4. Validate Financial Impact

Connect your effort reduction initiatives directly to CLV and NRR metrics. Track how customers who experience low-effort job execution behave differently: longer retention, higher expansion rates, lower support costs, reduced price sensitivity.


This financial validation transforms your moat-building from a product hypothesis into a proven equity value creation strategy. It's how you demonstrate to your board and investors that customer experience improvements aren't soft metrics—they're directly building enterprise value.


5. Scale with AI

Traditional approaches to job mapping and effort measurement require extensive manual research for each customer segment and market. Our AI-driven method changes this calculus entirely.


What used to take a team months can now happen in hours. Our AI analyzes customer data, identifies high-effort job steps, prioritizes opportunities based on willingness to pay, and translates insights into specific product recommendations. This speed advantage means you can build your moat faster than competitors can identify the opportunity.


Stop fighting a losing battle for loyalty. Start building a strategic moat based on the flawless execution of your customer's most important job. That is the only source of defensibility that lasts.


Frequently Asked Questions



What is the difference between Customer Effort Score and other metrics like NPS or CSAT?


Net Promoter Score (NPS) measures loyalty and willingness to recommend, while Customer Satisfaction (CSAT) measures happiness with a specific interaction. Both are lagging indicators and poor predictors of actual behavior. CES, however, measures the difficulty of getting something done, which is a leading indicator of future loyalty and churn. Low effort is a direct driver of retention; high satisfaction is not. At thrv, we focus on CES because it points directly to where you can build competitive advantage—by making jobs easier than any alternative.


Isn't building a moat around job execution just good product management or UX design?


Good UX is a component, but this strategy is much broader. UX focuses on the usability of an interface, while a JTBD approach focuses on the efficiency and effectiveness of the customer's entire workflow, which may span multiple tools and departments. The goal isn't just an easy-to-use product, but an indispensable solution that becomes the operational standard for getting a critical job done. When we work with portfolio companies, we're often improving jobs that extend far beyond a single product interface.


How can we start implementing this without a massive research project?


Begin small. Identify what you believe is the single most critical job your customers hire your product for. Break that job down into 5-7 major steps. Then, start surveying a small cohort of customers with a simple question after they complete each step: "How easy or difficult was it for you to complete this step?" Even this basic data will provide more actionable insights than most broad-based satisfaction surveys. Our AI-powered platform accelerates this process significantly, but the fundamental principle works at any scale.


Our product has many features. How do we focus on just one "job"?


This is a common challenge. Customers don't hire a bundle of features; they hire a product to make progress on a core job. It's critical to distinguish the primary job from smaller, supporting tasks. For example, a customer hires accounting software for the core job of "maintain accurate financial records to ensure compliance and business health." Features like invoicing or payroll are simply tools that help execute steps within that larger job. Focusing on the core job provides clarity and prevents your roadmap from becoming a collection of disconnected feature requests.


How long does it typically take to see results from this approach?


The timeline varies by company size and market dynamics, but our experience with portfolio companies shows that meaningful results emerge within 12-18 months when the approach is implemented systematically. Target Registry achieved over 25% annual revenue growth in this timeframe. The key is consistent focus on high-effort job steps rather than scattered feature development. Our AI-driven method significantly accelerates the initial insight generation phase, allowing companies to start building their moat within weeks rather than months.


Posted by thrv

Share: