Unmet Needs Prioritization is a systematic methodology for identifying, evaluating, and ranking customer needs based on how well they are currently satisfied and how important they are to customers.
This approach is founded on the Jobs To Be Done principle that customers "hire" products to help them accomplish goals, and they switch to new solutions when they find one that satisfies their unmet needs better than alternatives. By identifying which needs are most important yet poorly satisfied, companies can focus innovation resources on opportunities that will create the most customer value and drive adoption.
Effective prioritization of unmet needs offers significant advantages over traditional approaches:
By focusing on validated customer needs rather than assumed solutions, companies reduce the risk of building products that customers don't want or won't pay for.
Understanding which needs are underserved reveals opportunities for meaningful differentiation that competitors can't easily copy, rather than temporary feature advantages.
Resources are directed toward opportunities with proven customer importance and dissatisfaction, rather than spread across speculative features or competitive matching.
Products designed to address high-priority unmet needs have higher adoption rates because they solve genuine customer problems rather than offering marginal improvements.
When products address important unmet needs significantly better than alternatives, customers are willing to pay premium prices, enhancing margins and profitability.
What are the components of effective Unmet Needs Prioritization?
A comprehensive approach to Unmet Needs Prioritization includes these key components:
The foundation of prioritization is a complete inventory of customer needs:
These well-defined needs become the units of analysis for prioritization.
For each identified need, measure how important it is to customers:
These important ratings help identify which needs matter most to customers.
Measure how well current solutions satisfy each need:
These satisfaction assessments identify where current solutions fall short.
Calculate metrics that indicate innovation opportunity:
Importance score - How important the need is to customers (e.g., 1-10)
Satisfaction score - How satisfied customers are with current solutions (e.g., 1-10)
Opportunity score = Importance + (Importance - Satisfaction)
Raw gap = Importance - Satisfaction
Relative gap = (Importance - Satisfaction) / Importance
These calculated metrics help quantify the value of addressing each need.
This segmentation reveals which customer groups represent the most attractive targets.
Evaluate how well competitors satisfy high-opportunity needs:
This competitive analysis helps identify strategic opportunities and threats.
1. Create a comprehensive needs inventory
Validate the inventory with diverse customers
This inventory provides the foundation for all subsequent prioritization.
2. Design and conduct quantitative research
This research provides the data needed for prioritization decisions.
3. Calculate opportunity metrics
Process research data to identify high-value opportunities:
These calculations transform raw data into actionable insights.
4. Conduct segment-based analysis
Identify how opportunities vary across customer segments:
This segmentation guides targeting decisions and product strategy.
5. Evaluate competitive positioning
Assess how your solution compares to alternatives:
Evaluate emerging solutions that might address unmet needs
This competitive analysis informs differentiation strategy.
6. Create prioritized roadmaps
Translate opportunity analysis into action plans:
What frameworks help with Unmet Needs Prioritization?
This visualization plots all needs on two dimensions:
Horizontal axis: Satisfaction with current solutions
The resulting quadrants help categorize needs:
This framework provides an intuitive visual representation of priorities.
This calculation identifies needs with the greatest innovation potential:
Opportunity = Importance + (Importance - Satisfaction)
This formula ranges from 0-19 (on a 10-point scale) and weights needs by both absolute importance and the gap between importance and satisfaction. Scores above 15 typically indicate significant opportunities.
This framework categorizes needs based on their relationship to customer satisfaction:
Must-Have Needs: Cause dissatisfaction when not met but don't create positive satisfaction when met
Performance Needs: Create satisfaction proportional to their level of satisfaction
Delighter Needs: Create positive satisfaction when met but don't cause dissatisfaction when not met
This categorization helps develop balanced solutions that address different types of needs.
This framework maps opportunity scores across customer segments:
Cells contain opportunity scores for each segment-need combination
This matrix reveals which segments have clusters of unmet needs that could be addressed together.
This framework evaluates potential solutions against unmet needs:
Cells score how well each solution addresses each need
This assessment helps compare alternative approaches to addressing unmet needs.
What are common challenges in Unmet Needs Prioritization?
Poorly defined needs that mix solution characteristics with outcomes or vary in specificity make prioritization difficult. Consistent formatting as actions and variables is essential.
Surveys that use inconsistent scales, leading questions, or technical jargon produce unreliable data. Careful survey design and testing are critical for valid results.
Research that overrepresents certain customer types or current users while underrepresenting potential customers creates skewed priorities. Representative sampling is essential.
Analyzing needs at only the aggregate level obscures important segment-specific opportunities. Segment-level analysis is necessary to identify targeted opportunities.
Quantitative priorities should be complemented with qualitative understanding of why needs are important and how customers try to satisfy them today.
These measure how prioritization affects development effectiveness:
Effective prioritization should improve these operational metrics.
These measure how well priorities translate to customer outcomes:
These metrics indicate whether prioritization is creating real customer value.
These measure how prioritization affects business results:
Customer acquisition - Increases in new customers from better need satisfaction
Customer retention - Improvements in renewal rates and reduced churn
Expansion revenue - Growth from existing customers adopting additional capabilities
Price realization - Ability to command premium prices for superior need satisfaction
Resource efficiency - Return on investment in development resources
These metrics connect prioritization to business performance.
These indicators reflect the strategic impact of effective prioritization.
Feature voting lets customers or stakeholders vote on desired features without considering their underlying needs. This leads to incremental improvements rather than addressing fundamental job challenges.
The MoSCoW method (Must have, Should have, Could have, Won't have) categorizes requirements based on stakeholder opinions rather than quantified customer need data, often reflecting internal politics rather than market opportunities.
Agile story points prioritize based on development effort rather than customer value, potentially leading to efficient delivery of low-impact capabilities.
Traditional ROI calculations often rely on revenue projections without understanding the underlying customer needs driving adoption, leading to optimistic forecasts for features customers don't actually value.
Prioritizing based on competitor features leads to parity rather than differentiation anthrvsses opportunities to address unmet needs that competitors also overlook.
thrv provides specialized methodologies and tools to help companies implement effective Unmet Needs Prioritization. The thrv platform includes frameworks for defining consistent needs, survey tools for measuring importance and satisfaction, analytics for calculating opportunity scores, visualization tools for communicating priorities, and roadmapping capabilities for translating priorities into action.
For organizations struggling with subjective prioritization, feature bloat, or low innovation success rates, thrv's approach to Unmet Needs Prioritization provides a clear path to more effective resource allocation based on quantified customer needs. The result is more impactful innovations, higher adoption rates, and stronger competitive positions—all derived from focusing on the needs that matter most to customers.