What is a Results Based Product Roadmap?
A Results Based Product Roadmap is a strategic planning tool that organizes product development priorities around customer outcomes rather than features or timelines. From a Jobs To Be Done perspective, this approach shifts focus from what will be built to what progress customers will be able to make customer needs development efforts. Unlike traditional roadmaps that often serve as feature delivery schedules, Results Based Product Roadmaps define success in terms of measurable improvements in how customers execute their jobs.
This approach recognizes that customers don't ultimately care about features—they care about making progress on goals that matter to them. By organizing roadmaps around the outcomes customers are trying to achieve, companies create clearer strategic direction, better cross-functional alignment, more meaningful prioritization criteria, and greater flexibility in how outcomes are delivered.
Results Based Product Roadmaps transform product planning from a list of commitments into a strategic tool that guides decision-making throughout the organization. By connecting development priorities directly to customer needs and business goals, these roadmaps help teams make better decisions about where to invest resources for maximum impact.
Why are Results Based Product Roadmaps important?
Traditional product roadmaps often fail to drive effective development for several key reasons:
1. Feature-oriented thinking
Many roadmaps present lists of features without explaining why they matter, leading to development that doesn't create meaningful customer value.
2. Artificial timeline commitments
Traditional roadmaps often include specific delivery dates that create pressure to ship features by arbitrary deadlines rather than when they actually satisfy customer needs.
3. Flexibility limitations
Feature-based roadmaps make it difficult to adapt to changing market conditions or incorporate new learnings, as teams feel committed to delivering specific solutions.
4. Disconnection from strategy
Many roadmaps fail to show clear connection between development priorities and broader business strategy, leading to misaligned efforts.
5. Unclear success metrics
Without outcome-based targets, teams lack clear criteria for measuring whether delivered features actually achieved their intended purpose.
What are the key components of effective Results Based Product Roadmaps?
A comprehensive Results Based Product Roadmap includes these key components:
1. Customer Job Framework
The foundation for outcome definition:
- Clear articulation of target customer jobs-to-be-done
- Identification of specific job steps where customers struggle
- Prioritization of needs based on importance and satisfaction gaps
- Segmentation of customers by job execution patterns
- Economic impact assessment of job satisfaction improvement
This job framework provides the foundation for defining meaningful outcomes.
2. Outcome Definition and Measurement
Clear targets expressed as customer results:
- Specific improvements in job execution speed or accuracy
- Measurable reductions in customer effort
- Clear success metrics for job step completion
- Quantifiable enhancements in job outcomes
- Economic value creation for customers
These outcome definitions create clear targets independent of specific solutions.
3. Strategic Theme Organization
Grouping of related outcomes:
- Thematic clusters of related customer outcomes
- Connection to strategic business priorities
- Cross-functional alignment around themes
- Clear scope boundaries for each theme
- Relative prioritization across themes
This thematic organization creates strategic clarity and focus.
4. Flexible Solution Approaches
Options for achieving defined outcomes:
- Multiple potential approaches to delivering outcomes
- Hypothesis-driven development within outcome boundaries
- Room for discovery and learning during implementation
- Adaptation based on emerging customer insights
- Progressive validation of solution effectiveness
This flexibility ensures teams can adapt how outcomes are delivered.
5. Progressive Horizon Planning
Different levels of detail across time periods:
- Near-term specific outcomes with defined approaches
- Mid-term clear outcomes with flexible approaches
- Long-term strategic directions and opportunity areas
- Increasing flexibility further into the future
- Regular review and adjustment as time progresses
This progressive planning balances clarity with adaptability.
How do you create an effective Results Based Product Roadmap?
1. Start with customer jobs and needs
Build the foundation for meaningful outcomes:
- Define the jobs customers are trying to accomplish
- Break jobs into discrete steps (typically 15-20)
- Identify specific needs within each step (usually 5-10 per step)
- Measure importance and satisfaction for each need
- Calculate opportunity scores to identify underserved needs
This customer research provides the basis for defining meaningful outcomes.
2. Connect customer needs to business objectives
Create alignment between customer and business outcomes:
- Identify key business metrics driving company success
- Determine how customer job satisfaction affects these metrics
- Map relationships between specific needs and business outcomes
- Prioritize needs with highest combined customer and business impact
- Create clear connections that demonstrate strategic alignment
This connection ensures roadmap serves both customer and business needs.
3. Define measurable customer outcomes
Create clear targets focused on results:
- Formulate outcomes as improvements in job execution
- Define specific metrics for each outcome
- Establish baseline measurements for current performance
- Set targets for meaningful improvement
- Create measurement approaches for tracking progress
These clear outcome definitions shift focus from features to results.
4. Organize outcomes into strategic themes
Group related outcomes for strategic clarity:
- Identify natural clusters of related outcomes
- Create theme statements that capture strategic intent
- Align themes with broader company priorities
- Establish clear scope boundaries for each theme
- Prioritize themes based on strategic importance
This thematic organization creates clarity and alignment.
5. Create appropriate time horizons
Develop progressive planning across time periods:
- Define appropriate horizon timeframes (e.g., now/next/later)
- Allocate outcomes across horizons based on priority and dependencies
- Provide appropriate detail for each horizon
- Establish regular review cadence for each horizon
- Create processes for moving items between horizons
This horizon approach balances clarity with flexibility.
6. Implement collaborative governance
Establish processes for roadmap management:
- Create clear ownership for roadmap outcomes
- Develop review processes for measuring outcome achievement
- Establish adjustment mechanisms for incorporating new insights
- Implement prioritization frameworks for competing outcomes
- Design communication approaches for sharing roadmap
This governance ensures the roadmap remains a living strategic tool.
What frameworks help with Results Based Product Roadmaps?
The Outcome-Solution Matrix
This framework connects outcomes to potential approaches:
- Rows represent desired customer outcomes
- Columns show potential solution approaches
- Cells indicate how well each approach might deliver each outcome
- Alternatives provide flexibility in implementation
- Dependencies show relationships between solutions
This matrix ensures teams remain focused on outcomes while maintaining implementation flexibility.
The Impact-Effort Prioritization Framework
This framework guides outcome prioritization:
- Horizontal axis represents implementation effort
- Vertical axis shows customer and business impact
Plotting outcomes creates four quadrants:
- High impact/low effort: "Quick wins"
- High impact/high effort: "Strategic investments"
- Low impact/low effort: "Fill-ins"
- Low impact/high effort: "Reconsider"
This visualization helps teams prioritize outcomes for maximum impact.
The Now-Next-Later Horizon Model
This framework structures planning across time periods:
- "Now" horizon (e.g., 1-3 months): Specific outcomes with defined approaches
- "Next" horizon (e.g., 3-9 months): Clear outcomes with flexible approaches
- "Later" horizon (e.g., 9+ months): Strategic opportunity areas
This model provides appropriate detail and flexibility across different time periods.
The Outcome Achievement Scorecard
This framework tracks progress toward outcomes:
- Outcomes listed with specific metrics
- Baseline measurements for each metric
- Current status of each metric
- Target values for success
- Progress indicators showing advancement
This scorecard maintains focus on outcome achievement rather than feature delivery.
The Strategic Alignment Map
This framework connects roadmap to broader strategy:
- Company strategic objectives at the top
- Customer jobs and needs in the middle
- Roadmap outcomes at the bottom
- Connection lines showing relationships
- Indicators showing strength of alignment
This map ensures roadmap directly supports strategic objectives.
What are different formats for Results Based Product Roadmaps?
Outcome-Based Timeline
A time-oriented view focusing on outcomes:
- Horizontal axis represents time periods
- Swim lanes represent strategic themes
- Cards show customer outcomes rather than features
- Metrics indicate success criteria for each outcome
- Dependencies show relationships between outcomes
This format maintains time orientation while shifting focus from features to results.
Strategic Theme Board
A theme-oriented view without specific timelines:
- Columns represent strategic themes
- Rows show priority levels within themes
- Cards describe customer outcomes
- Priority indicators show
- Metrics define success for each outcome
This format emphasizes strategic focus areas rather than delivery dates.
Opportunity Map
A job-oriented view showing customer needs:
- Structure follows customer job steps
- Cards represent high-opportunity needs
- Size indicates opportunity magnitude
- Color coding shows outcome status
- Connections show relationships between needs
This format maintains clear connection to customer jobs and needs.
OKR-Style Roadmap
An objective-and-key-result approach:
- Objectives stated as customer outcome improvements
- Key results defined as specific metrics
- Current status shown for each key result
- Target values indicating success
- Time periods for outcome achievement
This format leverages familiar OKR structure for outcome orientation.
Horizon-Based Board
A time-horizon approach without specific dates:
- Columns represent time horizons (Now/Next/Later)
- Rows show strategic themes
- Cards describe customer outcomes
- Confidence indicators show certainty level
- Metrics define success criteria
This format balances time orientation with appropriate flexibility.
What are common challenges in implementing Results Based Product Roadmaps?
Outcome definition difficulty
Many teams struggle to shift from feature descriptions to outcome definitions. Consistent use of templates and training on outcome formulation helps overcome this challenge.
Measurement complexity
Defining and tracking metrics for outcomes can be more challenging than simply checking off feature completion. Investing in appropriate measurement capabilities is essential for success.
Stakeholder expectations
Stakeholders accustomed to feature-based commitments with specific dates may resist the flexibility of outcome-based roadmaps. Education and gradual transition helps manage this change.
Team capability gaps
Product teams may lack the skills to effectively define and measure outcomes. Training and coaching on outcome-based methods helps build necessary capabilities.
Governance transitions
Traditional governance processes often focus on feature delivery rather than outcome achievement. Updating review and decision-making processes is critical for successful implementation.
How do you use Results Based Product Roadmaps to drive product success?
1. Guide development prioritization
Use outcomes to focus development efforts:
- Prioritize work that contributes most to key outcomes
- Evaluate potential features based on outcome contribution
- Adjust priorities as outcome achievement data emerges
- Maintain flexibility in how outcomes are achieved
- Create clear connection between daily work and strategic objectives
This outcome-based prioritization ensures development resources create maximum value.
2. Align cross-functional efforts
Create shared understanding across departments:
- Provide clear purpose for development initiatives
- Help marketing communicate outcome benefits rather than features
- Enable sales to sell value rather than functionality
- Guide customer success in driving outcome achievement
- Create executive alignment around strategic priorities
This alignment ensures all functions contribute to outcome achievement.
3. Enable more effective decision-making
Provide clear criteria for ongoing choices:
- Evaluate new opportunities against defined outcomes
- Make scope decisions based on outcome contribution
- Assess trade-offs using outcome impact as primary criterion
- Determine when outcomes have been sufficiently achieved
- Guide resource allocation across competing priorities
These decision criteria improve product development effectiveness.
4. Facilitate better communication
Enhance stakeholder understanding and engagement:
- Communicate purpose and value rather than just delivery plans
- Create shared language around customer outcomes
- Establish clearer connection to business value
- Enable more meaningful progress tracking
- Support more strategic executive conversations
This improved communication creates stronger organizational alignment.
5. Increase development flexibility
Enable more effective adaptation:
- Provide freedom to adjust approaches based on learning
- Support experimentation within outcome boundaries
- Enable faster response to changing market conditions
- Reduce artificial delivery pressure for specific features
- Create space for discovery and innovation
This flexibility improves product quality and market fit.
How do you measure the effectiveness of Results Based Product Roadmaps?
Outcome Achievement Metrics
These measure progress toward defined outcomes:
- Outcome completion rate - Percentage of roadmap outcomes successfully achieved
- Achievement quality - Degree to which outcomes are fully realized
- Time to outcome - How quickly outcomes are achieved
- Outcome impact - Actual business value created by outcomes
- Predictive accuracy - How well outcome predictions match reality
These metrics reveal whether roadmap delivers intended customer and business results.
Product Development Effectiveness Metrics
These assess how roadmap affects development:
- Development alignment - Percentage of work directly supporting roadmap outcomes
- Resource optimization - Efficiency of resource use in outcome achievement
- Flexibility utilization - How effectively teams adapt approaches based on learning
- Innovation enablement - Creation of novel approaches within outcome boundaries
- Technical quality - Impact on code quality and technical debt
These metrics show how roadmap influences development practices.
Organizational Alignment Metrics
These measure cross-functional coordination:
- Stakeholder understanding - Comprehension of roadmap across departments
- Decision consistency - Alignment of decisions with roadmap priorities
- Cross-functional coordination - Effectiveness of collaboration around outcomes
- Strategic coherence - Connection between roadmap and broader strategy
- Communication clarity - Effectiveness of roadmap as communication tool
These metrics reveal how well roadmap aligns the organization.
Business Impact Metrics
These connect roadmap to business results:
- Revenue growth - Increases attributable to roadmap outcomes
- Customer acquisition - New customers driven by outcome achievements
- Retention improvement - Reduced churn from outcome delivery
- Development ROI - Return on investment in development resources
- Market position enhancement - Competitive advantages from outcomes
These metrics translate roadmap effectiveness into business performance.
How do Results Based Product Roadmaps differ from traditional approaches?
Versus Feature-Based Roadmaps
Traditional roadmaps list features to be delivered by specific dates. Results Based Roadmaps define outcomes to be achieved, providing flexibility in how those outcomes are delivered and focusing on value rather than output.
Versus Timeline-Oriented Roadmaps
Traditional roadmaps often organize primarily around quarters or months. Results Based Roadmaps may use time horizons but focus primarily on outcomes and their relationships rather than specific delivery dates.
Versus Technology Roadmaps
Traditional technology roadmaps focus on system components and infrastructure. Results Based Roadmaps connect technical evolution to customer outcomes, ensuring technology serves strategic purposes.
Versus Release Plans
Traditional release plans detail what will ship when. Results Based Roadmaps focus on what customer value will be created, allowing release timing to be determined by outcome achievement rather than arbitrary dates.
Versus Product Backlogs
Traditional backlogs list features in priority order. Results Based Roadmaps group initiatives around strategic outcomes, providing context for backlog items and ensuring they connect to customer and business value.
How thrv helps with Results Based Product Roadmaps
thrv provides specialized methodologies and tools to help companies implement effective Results Based Product Roadmap centered on customer jobs and outcomes. The thrv platform enables teams to map customer jobs, identify high-opportunity needs, define clear outcome metrics, organize strategic themes, create appropriate planning horizons, and implement collaborative governance processes.
For organizations struggling with feature-focused development, unclear priorities, or inflexible planning, thrv's approach to Results Based Product Roadmaps provides a clear path to more strategic product development based on a deeper understanding of what truly matters to customers. The result is better prioritization, stronger alignment, more adaptable development, and higher-impact products—all derived from focusing on the outcomes customers need rather than features alone.